DAILY NEWS
Opinion
This page lists the 15 posts providing a comprehensive overview of Project 2025, examining its proposed policies and potential impacts across diverse sectors, including federal governance, healthcare, education, environmental protections, and social services. Each summary addresses the initiative’s key objectives alongside critiques, highlighting supporters’ and critics’ perspectives on how these changes might reshape American society.
The Western Christian church has a long history of legislating morality in society. For many of the things proposed by Project 2025, like restricting LGBTQ rights or how to treat sexually explicit materials, there are many Christians who might say some version of “If Project 2025 wants to clamp down on those sinful things, I’m
Project 2025 is more than just a benign collection of policy ideas; it’s a blueprint for transforming the American government across multiple levels. Crafted by the Heritage Foundation and conservative leaders, the plan lays out sweeping changes from taxation to healthcare. This article lists the top 10 most consequential policies that could shape the country’s
We are now in the home stretch of our deep dive into Project 2025 and our attempt to understand, to the fullest extent, the conservative blueprint for the most radical transformation of the United States government in at least the last 100 years, if not our nation’s history. Implementing Project 2025 would fundamentally alter the
Project 2025 outlines a comprehensive plan aimed at reshaping the U.S. education system by promoting greater educational freedom and enhancing parental rights. Key proposals include expanding school choice through voucher programs, reducing federal oversight, and granting parents greater control over their children’s education, particularly regarding curricula on sensitive topics. Advocates argue that these measures will
Part 11 of the deep dive into Project 2025’s Pillar #4 offers a vision of personal freedoms rooted in conservative values. On the one hand, this pillar emphasizes religious liberty, gun rights, and minimal government involvement in areas deemed moral or religious, which many see as a positive step toward protecting core freedoms. Supporters argue
Project 2025 suggests that a new Republican president take steps to reduce the level of international engagement to which the United States is currently committed. It envisions this happening through two moves: “Transforming” NATO by reducing U.S. support Ending U.S. support for Ukraine Both of these would have huge implications for the ongoing Russia-Ukraine
Pillar #3 of Project 2025 seeks to bolster our national security by reinforcing U.S. sovereignty, tightening immigration controls, and safeguarding American resources from global threats- all in ways conservatives want. The authors of Project 2025 would say this approach is rooted in a vision of America as a strong, self-sufficient nation that defends its interests
Here, we wrap up our dive into Pillar 2 of Project 2025, highlighting its goals and objectives and showing where it provides extensive proposals for how the next Republican President can dismantle and reshape the administrative state. If you happen to think Head Start is a good thing, that consumer protections are good, or that
Part 7 of the Project 2025 Pillar 2 continues below. It touches on the many areas of regulation the U.S. government oversees and how changes in these regulations could impact the lives of everyday citizens, from protecting children’s educational opportunities to the environment, health and safety, worker and financial protections, and data privacy. Estimated reading
Our first five posts on Project 2025 introduce the project and its creators. We also discuss some dramatic policy proposals and the four overarching goals under Pillar 1 of the Project—“Re-establishing the Family as the Center of American Life.” Now, we dive into Pillar #2, and its thrust to drastically upend how the government functions. This
The debate over eliminating the federal role in disaster relief brings up important considerations. On the one hand, proponents argue that shifting disaster response to state and local governments would reduce federal spending and promote smaller government, a key objective of initiatives like Project 2025. This approach also offers the potential for tailored, localized responses
Page [tcb_pagination_current_page] of [tcb_pagination_total_pages]